Mmm.I don't think so.but in the image that I uploaded you can see them too in the leaves of the trees. Do you have an example of that with an image that does not have also the problem of chromatic aberrations? I am not sure I actually understand the smeared color issue.
#IRIDIENT X TRANSFORMER FILE RENAMER PROBLEM DOWNLOAD#
Thanks for the screenshot and the files (I will download them later on)! Platform (please complete the following information): I added only lens correction and defringe to make the differences more clear. On the left the enhanced color matrix, on the right the linear prophoto RGB. No artifacts or smeared colours in fujifilm RAF files processing. I own a Fuji X-T3 if you need some kind of sample RAF file. I'm no developer at all but If I could help, I would be happy to. Looking at the darktable's supported camera list, the custom color matrix for fujifilm cameras aren't available.
The smeared colors I suppose that would benefit only from a better demosaic.Īnyway this way and with a lot of color tweak through some modules, the results are very similar to Capture One. I tried changing the input color profile from "enhanced color matrix" to "linear prophoto RGB", and the results are that the colour rendition is wrong but the artifacts are nearly totally gone, making the image very very similar to the capture one version (from an "artifact" point of view at least). At the moment the best fuji RAF rendition by a third party editor is by Capture One. I noticed that the demosaic method needs to be perfectioned but maybe the solution could be a dedicated input color profiles for fujifilm cameras (I have an X-T3). There are artifacts in hight contrast zones and a "smeared" rendition of foliage in trees. Especially with foliage images or high contrast areas. The rendition of fujifilm RAF files is very problematic sometimes.
0 kommentar(er)
